I’m a huge proponent of digitizing my life as much as possible. When the data of my life is available as bits, its also searchable, sharable, and can be mined to ask interesting questions.
One possible drawback I’ve noticed though is that, when the objects of my life are physically present in my immediate environment, I can “bump into them” on accident and be spontaneously reminded of past experiences or future expectations. But as these objects are digitized, my room becomes emptier and emptier. Everything I keep or own is on my computer. My immediate environment is somewhat empty. With the digitization of my life, what am I losing that is unique to human interaction with physical objects?
There might be ways our brains respond to physical objects that are simply cannot be stimulated by the digital representation of those objects. I’ve heard plenty of people complain about the “digitization of human relationships”, but I think we’re completely overlooking the possible drawbacks of dematerialization and the disappearance of objects.
Tags: culture · digital culture · internet · psychology3 Comments
3 responses so far ↓
Decorate!
What Casey said… but with 62 inch LCD displays that present your historical data shadow in context to what you’re currently doing.
Another thing I considered was setting up a drop online that lets me text or email ideas to it and then installing a projector that throws up a rotating cloud of these ideas on my wall. I could even do this with tweets. The intent would be to remind me of the interesting threads of ideas I began to pursue but abandoned.
But a Zen fountain and some incense might be a good start